Apps built to be used by millions.

Cost tracks scope, not platform. A focused first version with a handful of screens and one core flow sits far below a product with accounts, payments, and live AI features. We scope in a first call, then give you a fixed range before any work starts, so nothing arrives as a surprise later.

It depends on scope, but you see progress weekly either way. We put a working build in your hands every week from the start of development, so the timeline stays visible rather than landing as one delivery at the end. Discovery and design come first, then build, then store submission.

Yes. You own the source code, the design files, and the store listings outright. We hand over the repository and transfer the App Store and Google Play entries to your accounts. There is no lock-in that requires you to keep working with us to keep running your own product.

Yes, both, and we aim for native quality on each rather than treating one as a port of the other. Most projects ship to the App Store and Google Play together. Which approach makes sense for a given product is something we settle during discovery, before design starts.

Yes. Wiring language models, image generation, and other AI features into an existing product is a large part of what we do. The harder part is rarely the model, it is designing the feature so it is genuinely useful and fails gracefully when the model does.

Launch is the middle of the process, not the end. We handle store submission and app store optimisation, then keep iterating on live usage data. Our own apps are held to the same standard, which is why the playbook is built around what happens after release.

Because we live with the decisions we make. Running our own portfolio means we carry the cost of a bad architecture choice or a weak onboarding flow ourselves, in retention and reviews. That experience is what we bring to client work, rather than shipping and moving on.